(The followingletter is alarming and vital tothe understanding of how far the issueof psychotronic weapons and projectsaimed at controlling American citizensand people everywhere has progressed.This letter is dated February 9, 1994.The organization involved is nolonger available at this address below.Ms. McKinney is said to be occupyinga much lower profile these days.Nevertheless, this is an importantdocumentto consider)
Association of National SecurityAlumni Electronic
Surveillance Project P. O. Box 13625
Silver Spring, MD 20911-3625
February 9, 1994
Chairman John Glenn
Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs
340 Dirkson Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Attention: Mr. Chris Kline Subject: Involuntary HumanExperimentationwith Non-Ionizing Radiation
Dear Mr. Kline:
Senator Glenn'spublicly-expressedoutrage that this government has (onceagain) been found to be engagingin brutal forms of involuntary humanexperimentation, and his demand, ineffect, that any and all forms of thistype of experimentation be exposedwas heartening.
Alarge and growing number of peoplein this country hope that the Senator'sexpressed outrage was sincere,and that your Committee's investigationsare not simply a means of divertingattention from complaints centering onthis government's long-term rolein involuntary human experiments withnon-ionizing forms of radiation. Now that the Departments ofDefense,Energy and Justice have openly admittedthat directed-energy weapons systemsdo indeed exist, complaints ofexperimentation with these systems cannolonger be ignored.
As stated to you during ourtelephoneconversation last week, this Project isfocused on complaints concerningexperiments with non-ionizing, so-called "non-lethal," directed-energyweapons, surveillance and psychotronicssystems. In bringing this to yourattention, I am representing theinterests, currently, of some 100 U.S.citizens, who are the subjects of bothvicious forms of overt harassmentand concurrent directed-energyharassment.
The enclosed copy of MicrowaveHarassmentand Mind-Control Experimentation is apreliminary investigative finding,only. The accompanying Supplementfurnishes an update on the currentstatusof this Project.
Iam also enclosing copies of lettersexchanged with, and directed to theDepartment of Defense, the Departmentof Justice, and the Food & DrugAdministration, which areself-explanatory.I am also enclosing copies of twoarticles concerning John Alexander, ofthe Los Alamos National Laboratory'sNonlethal Weapons Division, whichI will address below. Also enclosed is a letter to a woman in contact withthis Project which addresses some of the effects of long-term exposureto these so-called"non-lethal" systems. Just asa matter ofinterest--DoD-sponsored "hy'e" in the media to the contrarynotwithstanding--non-lethalweapons systems can be incrediblylethal. They are not gentle systems, asthis government would like for thepublic to believe. Questions which needto be asked by the Committee onGovernment Affairs, as a preliminary,are as follows:
1. By what formal means are U.S.Government agencies, to include the Department of Defense, preventedfrom testing "non-lethal",directed-energy weapons, surveillanceand psychotronics systems on U.S.citizens under involuntarycircumstances?
2. By what formal means are U.S.Government contractors andsub-contractors prevented from testing"non-lethal",directed-energy weapons, surveillanceand psychotronics systems on U.S.citizens under involuntarycircumstances?
3. Why does the Energy PolicyAct of 1992 fail to prohibit involuntary human experimentation with non-ionizingforms of radiation?
4. How many members of Congressand of the Administration haveinvestments in firms which are engagedin the development and testing ofdirected-energy systems?
5. Why is Los Alamos NationalLaboratory, a Department of Energy agency, engaged in the development of"non-lethal",directed-energy systems?
6. Why is John Alexander--a30-year US Army Special Forces veteran with a long-term interest in the"psychotronics" (mind-control) aspects of directed-energy systems--regarded as being particularlyqualified to direct the Non-LethalSystems Division of Los Alamos NationalLaboratory?
7. Why is the Department ofEnergy (and John Alexander in particular) in the business of promoting "non-lethal"systems as tools for law enforcement,and as weapons systems for the military?
8. Why are these"non-lethal"systems being kept classified?
9. Where is the test data on theefficacy of these directed-energyweapons, surveillance and psychotronicssystems being obtained, and who inCongress, specifically, is overseeingthose experiments?
10. Why is the Department ofDefense pushing for an increase in the numbers of Ground Wave Emergency Network(GWEN) towers in this country?
11. How many satellites launchedunder the auspices of DoD, the NationalReconnaissance Office, and theCentral Intelligence Agency are engagedin the surveillance of U.S.citizens" And how many of those satellites qualify as directed-energy emitters; i.e., as "amplified communications" satellites?
12. What federal constraintshave been placed on the construction ofmicrowave towers and other antennaearrays in this country; and whatassurances do U.S. citizens have thatemissions from those towers and antennae arrays are not being used forinvoluntary human experimental purposes?
14. Who in Congress isoverseeing the construction and use of microwave towers and antennae arrays in this country? 15. Why is it that complaints byU.S. citizens concerning directed-energy harassment and experimentationare being ignored?
16. Since Ms. .Susan PatrickFord, of the Department of Defense, appears to be unable to answer the questions posed in my letter to her dated November 18, 1993, can you answer these questions?
In sum, Mr. Kline, this is aproblem which Congress can ill afford to ignore. There are many angry people inthis country who are fed up with theseexperiments. (Not all experimenteesare kept effectively isolated.) A number of experimentees recognize therapidly burgeoning numbers of microwavetowers and antennae arrays in thiscountry are a part of the problem--alevel of recognition which, indeed,may have prompted the destruction of two major "communications towers"in Chiapas, Mexico, shortly prior tothat government's decision to closethe borders to that state.
A lawless government spawns a lawlessness,generally. It is apparent to me thatthis country is merely "testingits wings", so to speak, wherelawlessness and chaos, at this stage,is concerned. Creating more prisons andhiring more police is not the solution.
The U.S. Congress--and SenatorGlenn's Committee, in particular,--is in a position to ensure that no governmentagency, surrogate or otherwise, has alicense to run rampant over the humanand civil rights of citizens of thiscountry, and that this government,once again, learns to adhere to theprinciples which were the basis forthis country's creation.
Please do let me hear from youconcerning the foregoing.
Sincerely, JULIANNE MCKINNEY Director, ElectronicSurveillanceProject | 